Sir John Chilcot explains report delay to families

 

• 26 August 2015
• From the section UK Politics

Image caption Sir John Chilcot began his work in 2009

Sir John Chilcot has attempted to explain to families of British soldiers killed in Iraq why his inquiry is taking so long to complete.

In a statement, he said responses from those criticised in the report had opened up new lines of inquiry.

But he declined to set out a timetable for publication despite legal threats from the families.

Roger Bacon, whose son Major Matthew Bacon was killed in Iraq in 2005, said he was "disappointed" by the statement.

"I'm not sure he is able to understand our anguish," said Mr Bacon.

The families had threatened legal action unless Sir John set out a timetable on Wednesday. He has written to the families giving his reasons for the hold-up.

Sir John said he would not be making the contents of that letter public.

New issues'

But he issued a statement in response to their concerns, blaming the "Maxwellisation" process - where those criticised are given an opportunity to respond - for the delays.

"Individuals have not been given an open-ended timescale and Maxwellisation is not a process of negotiation.

 

Image caption Tony Blair was one of more than 100 witnesses at the inquiry

"The inquiry has remained in control of its deadlines throughout the process. In some cases, the response sent to us required detailed and complex analysis which has taken time."

He said the process had identified government documents "which had not been submitted to the inquiry and which have in some cases opened up new issues".

But he added: "We expect to receive the last responses to our Maxwellisation letters shortly.

"That will allow us to complete our consideration of the responses, to decide what further work will be needed, and to provide the prime minister and thus Parliament and the public with a timetable for the publication of our work."

Anguish'

When the inquiry was launched in 2009, then prime minister Gordon Brown said it would take at least a year.

Sir John said he understood "the anguish of the families of those who lost their lives in the conflict", but added "it is critically important that the report should be fair".

He has faced a barrage of criticism in recent weeks, with Prime Minister David Cameron expressing his frustration at the delays.

 

Image caption Clare Short suggested Maxwellisation was not to blame for the delays

Clare Short, who was international development secretary at the time of the 2003 invasion, said she did not believe the Maxwellisation process was the real reason for the hold-up.

The former minister is among those criticised in the report but she said the idea people were "endlessly being consulted I think is not true".

"I think what might be true is that the draft is very poor and it's as big as War and Peace I understand, lots of people have made serious responses and they are probably having to redraft," she told BBC Radio 4's The World at One.

"But I think the hope of it being a good piece of work that Britain learns what went wrong and we don't do it again looks very, very poor to me."

Blair criticism

All of those criticised had to reply to the inquiry within a deadline of a few weeks which had passed "a long time ago," she added.

She confirmed that she had received a draft copy of a section of the report that criticises her some time ago and that other individuals who were named would have seen sections relevant to them.

Earlier, the Guardian reported that the finished report will spread criticism well beyond Tony Blair and his inner circle of advisers.

Among those who could be in focus are the Labour former Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, Sir Richard Dearlove, then head of MI6, Sir John Scarlett, chairman of the joint intelligence committee, Geoff Hoon who was defence secretary, as well as Ms Short.